Geochemical halos of gold mineralization in the Geokhimicheskoe ore occurrence, Kuldzhuktau region (Uzbekistan)
https://doi.org/10.52349/0869-7892_2025_102_117-138
Abstract
The Geokhimicheskoe ore occurrence is located 1–1.5 km west of the Tau - shan deposit, within the southeastern exocontact zone of the Aktosty intrusive massif. The study aims to comprehensively analyze geochemical halos associated with gold mineralization in the Kuldzhuktau region (Uzbekistan) in order to identify their spatial and compositional characteristics, establish indicator elements reflecting mineralization processes, and substantiate promising directions for precious metal prospecting. Factor analysis was applied to process multi-element geochemical data from 620 samples. The results demonstrate that average gold concentrations exceed background levels by up to 1,200 times; Au, As, Ag, and W are identified as key pathfinder elements. Additional ore-localizing features include “through-going” anomalies of As, W, Sb, Mo, and Ag. The constructed additive Au + As anomaly mo del proved to be most effective in delineating promising flanking and deep-seated zones. The established geochemical zoning, which reflects sequential formation of miner - al assemblages, is confirmed as a critical criterion for predicting mineralization. The generated geochemical anomaly maps effectively highlight areas with high gold potential, providing guidance for further gold prospecting efforts.
About the Authors
B. B. Oganiyozov
University of Geological Sciences
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Bekhruz B. Oganiyozov, MSc (Earth Sciences), Independent Researcher (PhD)
Tashkent
M. M. Pirnazarov
University of Geological Sciences
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Majid M. Pirnazarov, DSc (Geology and Mineralogy), Senior Researcher,
Vice-Rector for Educational and Spiritual Affairs
Tashkent
References
1. Bounessah M., Atkin B. P. An application of exploratory data analysis (EDA) as a robust non-parametric technique for geochemical mapping in a semi-arid climate. Applied Geochemistry. 2003; 18 (8): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00247-0.
2. Identification of weak anomalies: A multifractal per - spective / R. Zuo [et al.]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2015; 148: 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.05.005.
3. Zhmodik S. M., Roslyakova N. V. Geochemistry of gold in hydrothermal processes. Development history of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch (AS USSR and RAS) and its research areas. Novosibirsk: Acad. Publ. House “Geo”; 2010. P. 486–490. (In Russ.).
4. Kim J.-O., Mueller Ch. W. Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Factor, discriminant, and cluster analysis / J.-O. Kim [et al.]; transl. A. M. Khotinskiy, S. B. Korolev; Ed. I. S. Enyukov. Moscow: Finances and Statistics; 1989. P. 5–77. (In Russ.).
5. Sinclair A. J. Selection of threshold values in geochemical data using probability graphs. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 1974; 3 (2): 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(74)90030-2.
6. Stanley C. R., Sinclair A. J. Comparison of probability plots and the gap statistic in the selection of thresholds for exploration geochemistry data. Journal of Geochemical Exp loration. 1989; 32 (1–3): 355–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(89)90076-9.
7. Kürzl H. Exploratory data analysis: Recent advances for the interpretation of geochemical data. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 1988; 30 (1–3): 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(88)90066-0.
8. Reimann C. Geochemical mapping: Technique or art? Geochemstry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis. 2005; 5 (4): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/03-051.
9. Chiprés J. A., Castro-Larragoitia J., Monroy M. G. Exp loratory and spatial data analysis (EDA-SDA) for determining regional background levels and anomalies of potentially toxic elements in soils from Catorce-Matehuala, Mexico. Applied Geochemistry. 2009; 24 (8): 1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.04.022.
10. Zhao J., Chen S., Zuo R. Identifying geochemical anomalies associated with Au-Cu mineralization using multifractal and artificial neural network models in the Ningqiang district, Shaanxi, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2016; 164: 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.06.018.
11. Agterberg F. P. Multifractal simulation of geochemical map patterns. Geologic modeling and simulation. Computer applications in the earth sciences / Eds. D. F. Merriam, J. C. Davis. Boston, MA: Springer; 2001. P. 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1359-9_17.
12. Reimann C., Filzmoser P., Garrett R. G. Factor analysis applied to regional geochemical data: Problems and possibilities. Applied Geochemistry. 2002; 17 (3): 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00066-X.
13. Razikov O. T., Maripova S. T., Tokhirzhonov K. O. Artificial intelligence methods in classifying geological and structural blocks with various metallogenic specialization in the mountains of Kuldzhuktau (Uzbekistan). Proc. of Sci. Conf. “Current Issues of Prospecting Geology”, Moscow, 22–24 Nov. 2022. Moscow: VIMS; 2023. P. 248–256. (In Russ.).
14. Khamrabaev I. Kh. Magmatism and postmagmatic processes in Western Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Uzbek SSR Acad. of Sci. Publ. House; 1956. 471 p. (In Russ.).
15. Karpova E. D. Metallogenic zoning of the Tien Shan and Pamirs. Soviet Geology. 1959; (8): 81–101. (In Russ.).
16. Geology of USSR. Vol. XXIII. Uzbek SSR. Mineral resources / Ed. Kh. T. Tulyaganov. Moscow: Nedra; 1983. 232 p. (In Russ.).
17. Borovikov V. P. Statistica. The art of computer-based data analysis. 2nd ed. Moscow [et al.]: Piter; 2003. 688 p. (In Russ.).
18. Belonin M. D., Golubeva V. A., Skublov G. T. Factor analysis in geology. Moscow: Nedra; 1982. 269 p. (In Russ.).
19. Kaiser H. F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psycho metrika. 1974; 39 (1): 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
20. Deposit density of tungsten polymetallic deposits in the eastern Nanling metallogenic belt, China / T. Li [et al.]. Ore Geology Reviews. 2018; 94: 73–92. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.01.010.
21. Bartlett M. S. Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology. 1950; 3 (2): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x.
Review
For citations:
Oganiyozov B.B., Pirnazarov M.M. Geochemical halos of gold mineralization in the Geokhimicheskoe ore occurrence, Kuldzhuktau region (Uzbekistan). Regional Geology and Metallogeny. 2025;32(2 (102)):117-138. https://doi.org/10.52349/0869-7892_2025_102_117-138
Views:
18
Email this article 