New data on the age of ancient conglomerates in the Ebelyakh, Billyakh, and Mayat River basins and their implications for commercial diamond potential, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)

In the Anabar diamondiferous region, within the unique placer deposits of the Ebelyakh, Billyakh, and Mayat rivers, blocks of conglomerates containing diamonds and high concentrations of kimberlite indicator minerals are widespread in the deluvial sediments. These conglomerates have not been identified in situ. Single fossil findings proposed the Carboniferous age for these formations, which implies the Paleozoic age for the primary source of the Ebelyakh placers. This paradigm encourages exploration for the primary sources of the unique placers but without success. The paper presents U-Pb (SIMS SHRIMP-II) detrital zircon dating data from these conglomerates; they demonstrate a wide age range, with the youngest values corresponding to the Early Cretaceous, which correspond to the timing of erosional-karst depressions developed extensively in the study area. These findings require a substantial revision of strategies for primary diamond deposits exploration in the Anabar region, accounting for the Mesozoic age of the target kimberlites, which could significantly reduce exploration costs.

1. Diamond placers of Russia / S. A. Grakhanov [et al.]; Chief Ed. D. A. Dodin. Novosibirsk: Acad. Publ. House “Geo”; 2007. 457 p. (In Russ.).

2. Davis G. L., Sobolev N. V., Kharkiv A. D. New U-Pb zircon dating results of kimberlites from Yakutia. Reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 1980; 254 (1): 175–179. (In Russ.).

3. Prokopchuk B. I., Sochneva E. G., Skosyrev V. A. First discovery of Carboniferous relict deposits in the Anabar River Basin (Western Yakutia). Reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 1970; 193 (5): 1137–1139. (In Russ.).

4. Grakhanov S. A., Smelov A. P. Age of predicted primary sources of diamonds in Northern Yakutia. Otechestvennaya Geologiya. 2011; (5): 56–64. (In Russ.).

5. Williams I. S. U-Th-Pb geochronology by ion microprobe. Applications of microanalytical techniques to understanding mineralizing processes / Eds. M. A. McKibben, W. C. Shanks III, W. I. Ridley. Vol. 7. Littleton, USA: Society of Economic Geologists; 1998. P. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.5382/Rev.07.01.

6. Improved 206Pb/238U microprobe geochronology by the monitoring of a trace-element related matrix effect; SHRIMP, ID-TIMS, ELA-ICP-MS and oxygen isotope documentation for a series of zircon standards / L. P. Black [et al.]. Chemical Geology. 2004; 205 (1–2): 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chemgeo.2004.01.003.

7. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analysis / M. Wiedenbeck [et al.]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research. 1995; 19 (1): 1–23. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.1995.tb00147.x.

8. Igneous zircon: Trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type / E. Belousova [et al.]. Contrib Mineral Petrol. 2002; 143: 602–622. https://doi:10.1007/s00410-002-0364-7.

9. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages of Yakutian kimberlite pipes / E. N. Lepekhina [et al.]. Intern. Kimberlite Conf.: Extended abstr. 2008; 9: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.29173/ikc3572.

10. Komarov A. N., Ilupin I. P. Geochronology of Siberian Platform kimberlites based on fission-track method. Geochemistry. 1990; (3): 365–372. (In Russ.).

11. Barton E. S., Brakhfogel F. F., Williams I. S. U-Pb zircon age for carbonatite and alkali-pikrite pipes, Orto-Yiarga Field (Yakutia), Russia. Intern. Kimberlite Conf.: Extended abstr. 1995; 6 (1): 37. https://doi.org/10.29173/ikc1771.

12. Ancient karst and its placer mineralization / B. I. Pro-kopchuk [et al.]; Publ. Ed. N. A. Shilo. Moscow: Nauka; 1985. 175 p. (In Russ.).

13. Sobolev N. V. On mineralogical criterions of diamond content in kimberlites. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 1971; 12 (3): 70–80 (In Russ.).

14. Sobolev N. V. The deep seated inclusions in kimberlites and the problem of the upper mantle composition / Publ. Ed. V. S. Sobolev. Novosibirsk: Publ. House “Nauka”; 1974. 264 p. (In Russ.).

15. Gurney J. J., Zweistra P. The interpretation of the major element compositions of mantle minerals in diamond exploration. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 1995; 53 (1–3): 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(94)00021-3.

16. Microcrystalline oxides from Russian kimberlites end related rocks / V. K. Garanin [et al.]. Moscow: Publ. House “GEOS”; 2009. 498 p. (In Russ.).

17. Compositional classification of “kimberlitic” and “non-kimberlitic” ilmenite / B. A. Wyatt [et al.]. Lithos. 2004; 77: 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.025.

18. Koptil V. I., Bilenko Yu. M. Typomorphism of diamonds from placers in the North-East Siberian Platform based on complex studies. Complex study methods of diamond-bearing materials: TsNIGRI Trans. No. 175. Moscow; 1983. P. 37–46 (In Russ.).

19. Zintchouk N. N., Koptil V. I. Typomorphism of the Siberian platform diamonds. Moscow: Nedra; 2003. 603 p. (In Russ.).

20. Orlov Yu. L. Mineralogy of diamond / Publ. Ed. G. P. Barsanov. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka Publ. House; 1984. 170 p. (In Russ.).

21.