Prospects for primary diamond potential of the Anabar Massif
https://doi.org/10.52349/0869-7892_2024_100_165-179
Abstract
There is a novel study of typomorphic features of picroilmenites, pyropes, and spinelides from the alluvium of the Legkiy Creek’s upper reaches, the right tributary of the Nalim-Rassokha River. Presence of a new kimberlite field in the Anabar Massif, in the basin of the Nalim-Rassokha and Ulakhan-Staraya rivers, confirms Krasnoyarsk geologists’ arguments (1984). Characteristic surfaces of mineral associations prove to pertain to the primary halo of kimberlite indicator minerals. Picroilmenites comparable to inclusions in diamonds and diamond-bearing peridotites are absent in the alluvium of the Bolshaya Kuonamka and Bargydamalaakh rivers draining non-diamond-bearing kimberlite fields. The quantitative ratio of pyropes of lherzolite (86 %) and dunite-harzburgite (11 %) parageneses is typical of kimberlites. The spinelides association originates from deep ultramafic rocks and the groundmass of kimberlites. There are grounds for discovering a new Rassokha diamond-bearing kimberlite field in the Anabar Massif, in the basin of the Nalim-Rassokha and Ulakhan-Staraya rivers.
About the Authors
B. E. BurakovRussian Federation
Boris E. Burakov - DSc (Geology and Mineralogy), Leading Specialist
Saint Petersburg
Scopus Author ID 6701735957
ResearcherID AFO-8439-2022
M. N. Goloburdina
Russian Federation
Marina N. Goloburdina - Leading Geologist
Saint Petersburg
S. A. Grakhanov
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Grakhanov - DSc (Geology and Mineralogy), Chief Researcher, Chief Geologist
Saint Petersburg
Yakutsk
References
1. Zaytsev A. I., Smelov A. P. Isotope geochronology of rocks of kimberlite formation of Yakut province. Yakutsk; 2010. 108 p. (In Russ.).
2. Zinchuk N. N., Koptil V. I. Typomorphism of diamonds of the Siberian platform. Moscow: “Nedra” Publisher; 2003. 603 p. (In Russ.).
3. Grakhanov S. A. Formation of the diamond-bearing placer of the Bolshaya Kuonamka River (north of the Siberian platform). Domestic geology. 2016; (6): 1–8. (In Russ.).
4. Grakhanov S. A. Prospects for the primary diamond potential of the Anabar crystalline massif. Bulletin of the State Committee on Geology: materials on geology and mineral resources of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). 2001; (1): 65–75. (In Russ.).
5. Precambrian diamondiferous provinces of the world / M. P. Metyelkina [et al.]. Moscow: “Nedra” Publisher; 1976. 134 p. (In Russ.).
6. Afanasyev V. P., Zinchuk N. N., Tichkov S. A. The problem of Precambrian diamond potential of the Siberian platform. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Geology. 2002; (1): 19–36. (In Russ.).
7. Diamond placers of Russia / S. A. Grakhanov [et al.]. Novosibirsk: “Geo” Publisher; 2007. 420 p. (In Russ.).
8. Paleozoic U-Pb age of rutile inclusion in diamond of V-VII type collected from placers of northeast part of the Siberian platform / V. P. Afanasyev [et al.]. Reports of Russian Academy of Sciences. 2009; 428 (2): 1–5. (In Russ.).
9. The Siberian lithosphere traverse: mantle terranes and the assembly of the Siberian Craton / W. L. Griffin [et al.]. Tectonophysics. 1999; 310: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00156-0.
10. New data on kimberlite age of Yakut diamond province / A. M. Agashev [et al.]. Reports of Russian Academy of Sciences. 2004; 399 (1): 95–99.
11. Isotope-geochemical and age characteristics of early Proterozoic terranes, collision zones and associated anorthosites in the north-east of the Siberian craton / O. M. Rozen [et al.]. Geology and Geophysics. 2000; 41 (2): 163–180. (In Russ.).
12. Clifford T. N. Tectono-metallogenic units and metallogenic provinces of Africa. Earth Planetary Science Letters. 1966; 1: 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(66)90039-2.
13. Manakov A. V. Patterns of diamond-bearing kimberlite distribution based on analysis of the deep structure of the lithosphere. DSc. dissertation (Geology-Mineralogy) abstract. Yakutsk: Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; 2002. 40 p. (In Russ.).
14. Afanasyev V. P., Zinchuk N. N., Pokhilenko N. P. Prospecting mineralogy of diamond. Novosibirsk : “Geo” Publisher; 2010. 650 p. (In Russ.).
15. Kostrovitskiy S. I. , Yakovlev D. A., Suvorova L. F. Evolution of the composition of picroilmenite from kimberlite pipes of Yakutia. Modern problems of geochemistry: Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference dedicated to the 95th anniversary of the birth of Academician L. V. Tauson. Irkutsk, Publisher of the V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences. 2012; 2: 90-93 (In Russ.).
16. Lithospheric mantle of the Nakyn kimberlite field (Yakutia) based on the study of mantle xenoliths and basalts of the Nyurbinskaya pipe / S. V. Sablukov [et al.]. Proceedings of the VII International Seminar. Alkaline Magmatism, Its Sources and Plumes. Irkutsk-Napoli, Publisher of the Institute of Geography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2007. P. 167–184 (In Russ.).
17. Compositional classification of “kimberlitic” and “non-kimberlitic” ilmenite / B. A. Wyatt [et al.]. 8th IKC Selected Papers. Lithos. 2004; 2 (77): 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.025.
18. Mitchell R. H., Bergman S. B. Petrology of lamproites. New York: Plenum Рress; 1991. 472 p.
19. Microcrystalline oxides from kimberlites of Russia / V. K. Garanin [et al.]. Moscow: “GEOS” Publisher; 2009. 498 p. (In Russ.).
20. Gurney J. J., Zweistra P. The interpretation of the major element compositions of mantle minerals in diamond exploration. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 1995; (53): 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(94)00021-3.
21. Sobolev N. V. On mineralogical criteria for diamond-bearing kimberlites. Geology and Geophysics. 1971; (3): 70–80 (In Russ.).
22. Nikishov K. N. Petrological and mineralogical model of the kimberlite process. Moscow: “Nauka” Publisher; 1984. 211 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Burakov B.E., Goloburdina M.N., Grakhanov S.A. Prospects for primary diamond potential of the Anabar Massif. Regional Geology and Metallogeny. 2024;31(4 (100)):165-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52349/0869-7892_2024_100_165-179