Preview

Regional Geology and Metallogeny

Advanced search

Shear dislocations of the Buzuluk depression and Pugachev arch junction zone in the Volga-Ural oil and gas province based on the 3D common depth point method seismic survey data

https://doi.org/10.52349/0869-7892_2025_103_79-89

Abstract

Gravimetric data allowed mapping a northeastern left-lateral strike-slip in the junction zone of the Buzuluk depression, Pugachev arch, Orlyanskoye-Iva-novskoye protrusion, and Sernovodsk-Abdulino aulakogen in the Volga-Ural oil and gas province. It has an amplitude of about 50 km and a length of over 300 km. A chain of low-amplitude disturbances stretches along the strike-slip. The gravitational field transformations calculations confirm the disturbance. The strike-slip is likely to impact on hydrocarbon deposits localization in the region. The paper aims to study the structure of the Buzuluk depression, Pugachev arch, Orlyanskoye-Iva-novskoye protrusion, and Sernovodsk-Abdulino aulakogen junction zone from the 3D common depth point method seismic survey data in the Zalesskaya area, its oil and gas potential, and “reconstruction” of possible strike-slip events. The study demonstrates that the region is likely to have northwestern left-lateral horizontal strike-slips with an amplitude of up to 5 km. Their strike coincides with the radial fault of the Sverdlovsk ring megastructure and strike-slip identified by gravimetric data. The “reconstruction” results in an expected strike-slip fault zone of a “jagged” type crossing the Zalesskaya area. Its direction coincides with annular faults of the megastructure. Most hydrocarbon deposits and promising structures of the Zalesskaya area are concluded to be associated with lines of expected disturbances of the strike-slip fault zone and their intersections.

About the Authors

E. A. Danilova
Institute of Geophysics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Evgeniya A. Danilova, PhD (Geology and Mineralogy), Senior Researcher

Ekaterinburg

Scopus Author ID 57336699500

ResearcherID GVT-2379-2022


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



Ya. D. Shibanov
Institute of Geophysics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Yaroslav D. Shibanov, Engineer

Ekaterinburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



References

1. Senchina N. P., Asoskov A. E. Reconstruction approach to the interpretation of strike-slip structures from geophysical data. Nedropolzovanie XXI Vek. 2023; (5–6): 50–57. (In Russ.).

2. On the influence of neotectonic movements on localization features of oil and gas fields in the Volga-Ural an-teclise / A. O. Agibalov [et al.]. Dynamic Geology. 2020; (2): 125–137. (In Russ.).

3. Gorozhanin V. M. Features of oil and gas accumulation in the salt dome regions of the southeast of the East European Platform. Current State of Earth Sciences: Proc. of the Intern. Conf. dedicated to the memory of Viktor E. Khain, Moscow, 1–4 Feb. 2011. Moscow: Publ. House of Geol. Fac., Lomonosov Moscow State Univ.; 2011. P. 480–484. (In Russ.).

4. Geological structure of the western part of the Pre-Ural trough in the Orenburg region and the structural position of oil and gas complexes / E. N. Gorozhanina [et al.]. Geologich-eskiy sbornik. 2009; (8): 221–226. (In Russ.).

5. Danilova E. A. Sverdlovsk radial-concentric structure as hydrocarbon accumulation center in plate junction zone. Proc. of Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas. 2024; (2): 14–25. (In Russ.).

6. Danilova E. A. Copper sandstones of the Sverdlovsk circular megastructure. Regional Geology and M etallogeny. 2024; 98: 32–40. https://doi.org/10.52349/0869-7892_2024_98_32-40. (In Russ.).

7. Kuzin A. M. Geological structure of consolidated crust in the region of Romashkinskiy deposit according to seismic observations of the CDP method. Part 2. Actual Problems of Oil and Gas. 2018; 1 (20): 37. https://doi.org/10.29222/ipng.2078-5712.2018-20.art37. (In Russ.).

8. Muravyov V. V. Geodynamics and oil and gas potential of concentric dislocations systems of lithosphere. Conditions of formation and patterns of placement of oil and gas deposits. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka; 1983. P. 121–127. (In Russ.).

9. The fault types and its role in the structure of the south-eastern margin of the Russian platform on new seismic data / A. N. Svetlakova [et al.]. Ural’skiy Geofizicheskiy Vestnik. 2010; (1): 45–58. (In Russ.).

10. Smirnova M. N. Oil and gas ring structures and scientific-methodical aspects of their investigation. Russian Oil and Gas Geology. 1997; (9): 51–55. (In Russ.).

11. Trofimov V. A. Deep regional seismic exploration studies of CDMP in oil and gas areas. Moscow: GEOS; 2014. 201 p. (In Russ.).

12. Volumetric model of deep structure and history of the Volga-Ural craton formation: Evidence of plume nature of the unique granulite-gneiss complex / I. B. Filippova [et al.]. General and Regional Problems of Tectonics and Geodynamics: Proc. of the XLI Tectonic Conf. / Publ. Ed. Yu. V. Karyakin. Vol. 2. Moscow: GEOS; 2007. P. 379–383. (In Russ.).

13. Kharchenko V. M. Nature of central-type structures and patterns of hydrocarbon deposits distribution, local and regional earthquake foci. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University. 2006; 6 (2): 48–53. (In Russ.).

14. Staroverov V. N., Tregub A. I., Matveyev V. V. A new point of view on the origin of Devonian graben-like troughs within the Volga-Ural oil and gas province. Volga and Pricas-pian Region Resources. 2013; (75): 3–15. (In Russ.).

15.


Review

For citations:


Danilova E.A., Shibanov Ya.D. Shear dislocations of the Buzuluk depression and Pugachev arch junction zone in the Volga-Ural oil and gas province based on the 3D common depth point method seismic survey data. Regional Geology and Metallogeny. 2025;32(3 (103)):79-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52349/0869-7892_2025_103_79-89

Views: 54


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-7892 (Print)